The consultation process has begun on proposals to build 900 homes that could result in green belt boundary revision.
Until 5pm on March 10, feedback can be submitted to Three Rivers District Council on four newly submitted sites across Kings Langley and Abbots Langley.
Two revised sites in Bedmond are also part of the consultation.
A total of 450 home have been proposed for building on Notley Farm in Bedmond Road, Abbots Langley.
The second largest site is on the Kings Langley Estate South where 380 homes could be built.
According to the consultation documents, both builds would be carried out in phases over six to ten years and, if allocated, the green belt boundaries would have to be revised.
To view the consultation procedure, click here.
Councillor Stephen Giles-Medhurst, deputy leader of the council and lead member for infrastructure and planning policy, said: “All the comments on this consultation and the earlier one [in 2021] will be important and taken into account as we develop our own new Local Plan that will be consulted on I hope in October.”
He added that the two larger sites in Kings Langley and Abbots Langley are being considered alongside a condition that neighbouring land is open for public amenity access for residents.
A developer has also proposed 25 dwellings at a disused care home – Margaret House in Abbots Langley.
It is expected to be built within five years and will not affect greenbelt.
Plans for 20 homes have been submitted for building at Land at Mill Place in Hunton Bridge, Kings Langley.
Currently used as storage, the phasing could last up to five years and the green belt boundary would not be revised.
The two sites proposed in Bedmond are to replace previous larger submitted plans in the village that have now been removed from the consultation.
One plan will not impact green belt because the 20-home proposal would be built on a car dealership in 56 High Street, Bedmond.
And developers have also submitted plans for 12 homes in North Cott, East Lane in Bedmond.
If the site is allocated, the green belt boundary would have to be revised.
Both are expected to be built within five years.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel