A mother who tried to kill her five-year-old son by jumping on to the tracks at Watford Junction station has been found not guilty of attempted murder on the grounds that she is insane.
The 46-year-old woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, jumped in front of a moving train while cradling her son, on July 21, 2009.
A jury at the Old Bailey heard on Monday the mother, from High Wycombe, was suffering from paranoid psychosis and was convinced she and her young son were being followed.
She had arrived on platform eight at about 4pm and sat in the shelter. Prosecution barrister Sarah Whitehouse said the woman then stepped out again on to the platform a few minutes later carrying her son, walked for a few metres and jumped onto the track in the path of an on-coming train.
The driver managed to halt the train between six to ten feet away from the two people, who were in the middle of the track, the court heard.
When asked what had happened, the woman said she had slipped because she was wearing flip-flops on a wet surface, although her son was heard to say “why did you jump mummy?”
Mrs Whitehouse told how witnesses noticed the woman was shocked but “was not not crying and showed no emotion”.
The boy was “crying hysterically” and his mother “repeatedly” said to him: “I'm sorry, I didn't mean it.”
She rejected the support of station staff and got back into her Land Rover, placing her son in the back seat, but without securing his child seat, Mrs Whitehouse said.
Less than half an hour after later, she deliberately drove her black Land Rover Discovery into the central reservations on the southbound M1, between Junctions 3 and 4. The car flipped onto its roof and skidded across three lanes of traffic before it came to a stop along the safety barriers.
The boy was airlifted to hospital and treated for several breaks and fractures to his arms. The woman was not injured but was later arrested and charged with two counts of attempted murder.
She was assessed by psychologists and deemed to be suffering serious psychosis. In a prepared statement, read out during one of her interviews, she said her son was “very dear” to her, she loved him “very much” and “would never knowingly do anything to hurt him”.
Forensic psychologist Dr Philip Joseph diagnosed the woman with paranoid psychosis and told the court the illness meant she would have been “out of touch with reality”.
He said: “She was expressing paranoid ideas and beliefs about conspiracies that were a threat to her own and her son's safety.”
Dr Joseph believed the condition had been brought on by the treatment towards her by work colleagues and her increasingly protective nature towards her son.
A report by a second psychologist supported Dr Joseph's assessment and Judge Peter Rook QC told the jury that none of the evidence put forward by the prosecution or the defence was in dispute.
He said the circumstances represented a “different” kind of case, and directed them to decide first on whether they believed she carried out the actions, and second, whether she was not guilty by reason of insanity.
The jury of six women and six men agreed she had tried twice to kill her son but found her not guilty on mental health grounds.
Judge Rook said she must serve a supervision order for two years under the watch of social services at Buckinghamshire County Council and must continue taking any prescribed medication.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article