A serial shoplifter who defrauded a Watford store and many other high street retailers during a £500,000 spree has been jailed for 10 years.
Narinder Kaur, 54, travelled all over the country to deceive retailers into refunding her for items she had stolen.
Gloucester Crown Court heard Kaur targeted Watford's John Lewis as well as the likes of Boots, Debenhams, Monsoon, House of Fraser and TK Maxx more than a thousand times between July 2015 and February 2019.
- Serial thief made £500,000 out of shop refunds con
- Pedestrian in 60s hospitalised after being hit by car at petrol station
- Man charged with attempted murder named as six bailed after shooting
The defendant, who is also known as Nina Tiara and has a long history of offending dating back to when she was a teenager, made it her full-time career to travel all over the country to carry out her deceptions.
The court heard Kaur was seen on CCTV entering stores, taking items from the shelves and taking them to the tills as if they had been previously purchased.
Close examination of her accounts confirmed the pattern of purchases and refunds and that the same process seen on the CCTV was being repeated on hundreds of occasions.
Gareth Weetman, prosecuting, said: “This defendant made it a full-time and lucrative endeavour.
“This was inherently sophisticated offending with sustained planning, carried out over a five-year period with a large number of victims.”
Mr Weetman said Kaur would rely on the goodwill of cashiers or store managers by telling them sob stories about sick relatives to commit her crimes.
Kaur took £33,131.61 in refunds from John Lewis stores, including in Watford, Milton Keynes, Chester, Cardiff, Chichester and Nottingham, having only spent £5,290.36 between August 2015 and December 2018.
The largest single fraud was committed against Boots and an examination of her many bank and credit card accounts showed she had visited stores in Cheltenham, Malvern, Solihull, Droitwich, Kidderminster, Dudley and Smethwick.
Kaur received £60,787.09 in refunds from the high street shop despite having only spent £5,172.73 with the retailer during that same period.
She also received £42,853.65 in refunds from Debenhams despite having only spent £3,681.33 during a four-year period.
Kaur also lied to a magistrates’ court by producing false documents to avoid being convicted of speeding offences and to a crown court in a bid to relax her bail conditions.
During two police searches of her home, around £150,000 in cash was found hidden away as well as stolen goods.
Kaur, of Chosen Hill, Cleverton, Wiltshire, was previously convicted by a jury of 26 charges, including fraud, possessing and transferring criminal property and perverting the course of justice.
John Cooper KC, defending, said delays in the case should not be held against the defendant who had been suffering in prison with her mental health.
“She has been a victim of bullying and racial abuse – it has not been easy,” he said.
“It has been extremely difficult for her and will continue to be extremely difficult for her. She has not found it easy.”
She had refused to leave Eastwood Park Prison and was instead sentenced in her absence today (July 30).
Judge Ian Lawrie KC, the Recorder of Gloucester, imposed a total sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment for crimes that were “stubbornly persistent and on a near-Olympian scale”.
“You indulged in a veritable tsunami of dishonesty and deceit on a varied assortment of victims,” he said.
“The majority of that dishonesty and deceit was carried out over a significant range of retail outlets covering an extensive geographical area from north to south, Warrington to Plymouth, and from east to west, London Colney to Swansea.
“There seems to have been no limit to your offending, all of which was conducted with resolute persistence, unburdened by restraint or inhibition.
“The scale of the offending was on a near-industrial scale. The overall value of the offending has been valued at £500,000.
“The collective scale and gravity of these offences means the court is left with no alternative option but to impose a significant term of custody.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel