Watford Community Housing has provided an update after initial surveys at its evacuated blocks were completed.
On February 9, residents in the Meriden Estate’s Cygnet House and Plover House were told they had to move out within nine days after a report revealed “structural defects” in the 2021-built homes in York Way.
The provider, Watford Community Housing(WCH), said it would find short-term accommodation for up to six weeks before arranging a longer-term option until people can return to their homes — which could take 12 months.
- Family reveals 'chaos and stress' in Meriden flats crisis
- Meriden flat blocks crisis as dozens told to evacuate
- Meriden flats crisis 'another nail in coffin' for businesses
As some short-term arrangements for some residents repeatedly fell through, it ended up taking until February 22 for everyone to move into temporary accommodation so that initial surveys to determine what work is required could get underway.
These have now been completed and WCH is awaiting the final report which will determine the timescale for the necessary remediation works.
There are 23 apartments across the two blocks, made up of four one-bedrooms and 19 two-bedrooms, as well as a row of shops on the ground floor.
Engineers have apparently advised that the shops can continue trading as normal and there is no risk to staff or customers.
Yesterday, a WCH spokesperson confirmed it would be engaging directly with residents and retailers in the building to provide an update once it has the report.
At the same time, WCH confirmed that “several” households have already been moved into longer-term accommodation.
“We are continuing to work closely with all remaining residents to provide support and finalise their longer-term moves,” the spokesperson added.
The “difficult decision” to evacuate the blocks was described as a “precautionary but necessary measure” when it was announced.
In February, construction company Mulalley confirmed it had undertaken initial investigations at the end of 2023, which revealed more surveys by specialist engineers were required.
After these took place, the recommendation was made that “whilst the building is safe”, remedial works would be required and would involve “intrusive” further surveys construction work inside the building.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel