Freedom of speech and accountability would be put “at risk” if a proposal to limit the number of questions councillors can ask at meetings is pushed through.
The Conservative group at Three Rivers District Council has accused the ruling Liberal Democrats of attempting to “suppress the ability to hold the administration to account”.
On Tuesday, a bid to introduce a rule which would limit a councillor to only asking one question each of the administration at meetings was postponed after last-minute talks between parties.
The Lib Dems say the idea came about because of the amount of officers' time being taken up providing answers to questions.
However, the party recognises a more "reasonable compromise" is needed rather than the rule suggested earlier this week.
At full council meetings in February and July, there were 82 questions aimed at the administration. This includes 22 from the Tories at Tuesday’s meeting while Lib Dem member and former council leader Cllr Sara Bedford submitted 21 questions.
Stephen Giles Medhurst, deputy leader at the council and chairman of the constitution sub-committee, said: “Having 82 questions over two meetings is undue burden on officers, consuming a considerable amount of their time and resource to get answers.”
Conservative group leader Ciaran Reed said his party would be taking a “large stand” against the proposal, adding: “There will be a limit to the number of issues that can be raised.
“They are claiming this is fine because written questions are still allowed. However, there is a clear difference between written questions and the administration being truly held to account through the opposition questioning them. This is another attack on fair and transparent government.”
Cllr Reed continued: “Even with the huge number of questions, we still finished Tuesday’s meeting with 20 minutes to spare.
“Despite that, the administration is still threatening to change the rules before October, leaving freedom of speech, the rights of the opposition and accountability at risk.”
Cllr Giles-Medhurst said the proposed rule is “absolutely not an attempt to shy away from accountability”.
Labour group leader Steve Cox said: “This is clearly a very important matter, we wouldn’t support what has been proposed.
“But there is clearly a problem and we must work together to find a solution. There is a delicate path to be trodden. Megaphone diplomacy doesn’t work.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel