Watford is one of two Hertfordshire towns that have been ranked amongst the UK’s most ‘vulnerable’ in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, councillors have been told.

At a meeting of the county council’s growth infrastructure, planning and the economy cabinet panel on Thursday (February 4), councillors were told of research by KPMG.

That research – said Neil Hayes from the Local Enterprise Partnership – had studied more than 100 towns and cities from across the UK.

It had considered a range of factors, councillors were told, such as levels of remote working in an area and town centre footfall.

And, in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, he said, it had ranked Hemel Hempstead as the second ‘most vulnerable’ town in the country.

Nearby Watford, he said, had been ranked as the seventh most vulnerable nationally – with seven of the ‘top 10’ towns to feature in the list in the South East.

And Mr Hayes said the results of the study “had come as a bit of a surprise to a number of policy makers”.

He suggested there was an issue of ‘historic commuter belt towns’, that had previously had a lot of ‘footfall’ with people going to and from work.

And he suggested that continued remote working after the pandemic would lead to a reduction in footfall in those commuter towns.

These towns may not, he said, have the night-time economy or leisure and culture facilities offered by core cities in other parts of the country.

And this, he suggested, was accelerating the need to have town centre plans and some ‘visioning’ work.

Liberal Democrat councillor Sandy Walkington said he was “surprised” to see the two Hertfordshire towns on the list of ‘vulnerable’ towns.

He pointed to previous reports that ‘losers’ were likely to be places like Canary Wharf, as more people continued to work remotely for part of the week.

And he suggested there may be future ‘opportunities’ for commuter towns, in terms of local retail, restaurants and gyms.

In response Mr Hayes said that the fundamental characteristics of the commuter belt were still strong, but may been to be reconfigured or re-purposed.

And he also suggested that if employees were only travelling into a central office one or two days a week, they may also choose to live much further away.

Cllr Mark Watkin, who represents the Nascot Park area of Watford, said he was “shaken” to find Watford was seventh on the list of most vulnerable towns.

He pointed to the towns ‘relatively vibrant’ retail situation, good night-time offer and culture.

And he asked if there was further clarification of how Watford had scored so badly in the survey.

Mr Hayes suggested the area lacked the sort of incubation facilities hat had grown in areas like Stevenage.

And he suggested that there were places like Watford and St Albans that if they could ‘pivot’ slightly could capture further opportunities.

“It means doing things slightly differently,” he said.

“But again, as you say, I think most of the component parts are there.

“It’s just changing, or recalibrating, some of those factors and focussing on some – like employment space and incubation – that haven’t really been featured in some of those plans to date.”